![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125842697/990563393.png)
50 Juegos Para El Pensamiento Lateral 50 Games For Lateral Thinking PDF Online. 9 11 Open Media PDF Kindle. Antidotos De La Nostalgia Claves Para Vivir Mejor PDF Kindle. Anuario De La Direccion General De Los Registros Y Del Notariado 2004 Anuarios Ministerio De Justicia PDF Online.
La interrelación de la creatividad, fluidez, pensamiento lateral y tecnología a la hora de diseñar Juegos Educativos Serios en un aula de ciencias naturales
Resumen
Introducción. La creatividad es la producción de los nuevos, originales, únicos, y divergentes productos e ideas mediadas a través del pensamiento lateral. La evidencia sugiere que los altos niveles de creatividad y la fluidez son importantes en el desarrollo continuo de interés de los estudiantes, la eficacia y en última instancia, el impacto de carrera en las ciencias.
Método. En este estudio, 559 estudiantes seleccionados al azar asistieron a un taller largo de ocho meses, para el diseño de videojuegos basados en la ciencia como herramienta de aprendizaje en el aula. Posteriormente, los estudiantes diseñan videojuegos basados en la ciencia que ejemplifican aprendidas, conceptos clave de la ciencia. Al finalizar el taller, todos los estudiantes se les dio la prueba de Pensamiento Creativo de Torrance para ayudar en el desarrollo de la comprensión de la relación entre la creatividad y las construcciones relacionadas.
Resultados. Los autores también explorar las implicaciones de la función del pensamiento lateral como un sistema cognitiva media en el aprendizaje de las ciencias. Los resultados sugieren que existe una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre el pre-test y post-test y los resultados que los datos confirman el modelo sugerido por el papel de la creatividad, la fluidez y el pensamiento lateral en relación con el procesamiento de la ciencia.
Discusión y conclusión. Tratando de promover el interés en las herramientas de apoyo creativas tales como los que se utilizan durante el diseño de SEGs puede proporcionar convergencia disciplinaria a través del pensamiento lateral. Más específicamente estos resultados están de acuerdo con los resultados encontrados en otros estudios como Yamamoto y Nakakoji (2005), Chen et al (2007) y Spencer, Lucas & Claxton (2012), que sugieren que hay manifestaciones conductuales subyacentes de la creatividad y la fluidez que afecta el proceso de la ciencia y el diseño a través de pensamiento lateralPalabras clave
Pensamiento lateral, cognición, enseñanza de la ciencia, neuropsicología educativa.
Referencias
Achieve, Inc. (2013). The Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24, 275–294. doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00056-X.
Almeida, L., Prieto, L., Ferrando, M., Oliveria, E., & Ferrandiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: the question of its construct validity, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 53-58. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357. doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.45.2.357
Andreasen, N. & Ramchandran, K. (2012). Creativity in art and science: are there two cultures? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 49-54.
Anwar, M., Rasool, S., & Haq, R. (2012). A comparison of creative thinking abilities of high and low achievers secondary school students, International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-6.
Arciniegas, D. B., Anderson, C. A., & Filley, C. M. (Eds.). (2013). Behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, A. P., & Adolphs, R. (2011). The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyB: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1726-1738. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0349
Baillargeon, R., Li, J., Gertner, Y., & Wu, D. (2011). How do infants reason about physical events? The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2, 11-48.
Barrès, V., Simons III, A., & Arbib, M. (2013). Synthetic event-related potentials: a computational bridge between neurolinguistic models and experiments. Neural Networks, 37, 66-92.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125-133. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021
Bond, C. E., Philo, C., & Shipton, Z. K. (2011). When There isn't a Right Answer: Interpretation and reasoning, key skills for twenty‐first century geoscience. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 629-652. doi.org/10.1080/09500691003660364
Boysen, S. T., & Capaldi, E. J. (Eds.). (2014). The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models. London, England: Psychology Press Taylor & Fancis Group.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological bulletin, 120(2), 189. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189.
Camazine, S. (Ed.). (2003). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cattell, R. B. (1956). Validation and intensification of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 112, 205-214. doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679.
Chen, M., Liou, Y., Wang, C., Fan, Y., & Chi, Y. (2007). TeamSpirit: Design, implementation and evaluation of a web-based group decision support system, Decision Support Systems, 43(4), 1186-1202. doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.07.008
Chow, C. (2012). Learning from our global competitors: A comparative analysis of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education pipelines in the United States, Mainland China and Taiwan.World Economic Forum.
Christoff, K., Gordon, A., Smith, R., & Vancouver, B. C. (2011). The role of spontaneous thought in human cognition. Neuroscience of Decision Making, 259-284.
Common Core Standards Initiative (2014). Common Core Standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ Crowder, J. A., Carbone, J. N., & Friess, S. A. (2014). Cognitive Intelligence and the Brain: Synthesizing Human Brain Functions. In Artificial Cognition Architectures (pp. 27- 52). New York, NY: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8072-3_4
Crutchfield, R. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. Contemporary approaches to creative thinking, New York New York: Atherton Press.
Deininger, G., Loudon, G., & Norman, S. (2012). Modal preferences in creative problem solving, Cognitive processing, 13(1), 147-150. doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0479-3
Dietrich, A. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. Consciousness and cognition, 12(2), 231-256. doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00046-6
Dimitrov, D. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields, Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Drachen, A., & Canossa, A. (2011). Evaluating motion: Spatial user behaviour in virtual environments. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4(3), 294-314. doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2011.041483.
Duncan, J. (2013). The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain. Neuron, 80(1), 35-50. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.015
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1783-1794. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1), 3-13. doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9340-3
Gotz, I. (1981). On defining creativity, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39(3), 297-301. doi.org/10.2307/430164.
Gramann, K., Gwin, J. T., Ferris, D. P., Oie, K., Jung, T. P., Lin, C. T., & Makeig, S. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans, Reviews in the Neurosciences, 22(6), 593-608. doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.047
Haigh, M. (2013). Fostering Creativity Through Science Education. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 744-748. New York, NY: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_365
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
Holliday, G. M., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Informal Science Educators’ Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, (aheadof- print), 1-24.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kaufman, J., Plucker, J. & Russell, C. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness, Journal of Psychoedcuational Assessment, 30(1), 60-73.
doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428196
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). Cost-benefit models as the next, best option for understanding subjective effort. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(06), 707-726. doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001532
Lamb, R. L. (2013). The application of cognitive diagnostic approaches via neural network of analysis of serious educational games. Doctoral dissertation. George Mason University.
Lamb, R. (2014). Examination of allostasis and online laboratory simulations in a middle school science classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 224-234. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.017
Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2009). A pilot study of online simulations and problem based learning in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Virginia Science Educator, 3(2), 34-50.
Lamb, R., & Annetta, L. (2012a). Influences of gender on computer simulation outcomes. Meridian, 13(1). doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9417-5.
Lamb R., and Annetta L. (2012b). The use of online modules and the effect on student outcomes in a high school chemistry class, Journal of Science Education and Technology, Online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9417-5.
Lamb, R., Annetta, L. Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2011). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 643-668. doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z
Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Vallett, D. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2014). Cognitive Diagnostic Like Approaches Using Neural Network Analysis of Serious Educational Videogames. Computers & Education. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.008
Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D., & Annetta, L. (2014). Development of a Short-Form Measure of Science and Technology Self-efficacy Using Rasch Analysis, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-17. doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9491-y
Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., Akmal, T., Baldwin, K. (2014). A computational modeling of student cognitive processes in science education. Computers & Education, 79, 116- 125. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.014
Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, (0). doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy- 032813-153700. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
McComas, W. F. (2012). Darwin's error: using the story of pangenesis to illustrate aspects of nature of science in the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 151-156. doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.3.5
Morcom, A. M., Bullmore, E. T., Huppert, F. A., Lennox, B., Praseedom, A., Linnington, H., & Fletcher, P. C. (2010). Memory encoding and dopamine in the aging brain: a psychopharmacological neuroimaging study. Cerebral Cortex,20(3), 743-757. doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp139
Meyer, A. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Inventing creativity: An exploration of the pedagogy of ingenuity in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 400-409. doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12039
Myers, B. A., Hudson, S. E., & Pausch, R. (2000). Past, present and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 7, 3–28. doi.org/10.1145/344949.344959
Myers, D. G. (1995). Psychology (4th Edition).New York: Worth Publishers Inc.
Onarheim, B., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Applying the neuroscience of creativity to creativity training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 656. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00656.
Raykov, T. (2004). Estimation of maximal reliability: A note on a covariance structure modeling approach. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 21-27. doi.org/10.1348/000711004849295
Ray, K., & Smith, M. (2010). The kindergarten child: What teachers and administrators need to know to promote academic success in all children, Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(1), 5-18. doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0383-3
Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 7– 30.
Roy, M., Shohamy, D., & Wager, T. D. (2012). Ventromedial prefrontal-subcortical systems and the generation of affective meaning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(3), 147-156.
Ruo, B. Baker, D. Thompson, J. Murray, P., Huber, G. & Sudano, J. (2008). Patients with worse mental health report more physical limitations after adjustments for physical performance, Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 417-421. doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816f858d
Shneiderman,B., et.al. (2008). Creativity support tools: Repost from a U.S. National Science Foundation, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2), 61-77. doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2002_1
Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151-1158. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Spencer, E. Lucas, B. & Claxton, G. (2012). Progression in creativity-developing new forms of assessment: A literature review, Creativity, Culture and Education.
Steiger, J. (1990). Some additional thoughts on components, factors and factor indeterminacy, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 41-45. doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_4
Surkova, I. (2012). Towards a creativity framework, Society and Economy, 34(1), 115-138. doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.2011.0013 Thorstuon, L. (1952). Creative talent. Applications of Psychology, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Torrance, E. (1970). Achieving socialization with sacrificing creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 183-189. doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1970.tb00858.x.
Tseng, S. W. W., & Lin, C. H. (2012). A Study on the Application of Design Thinking Strategy to Form Generation System. Advanced Materials Research, 502, 376-380. doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.502.376
Urhahne, D., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2011). Conceptions of the nature of science—are they general or context specific? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 707-730. doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9233-4
Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroscience of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019583.001.0001
Wilson, K., Vyakarnam,S., Volkmann, C., Mariotti, S. & Rabuzzi, D. (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century, World Economic Forum: A report of the Global Education Initiative.
Yamamoto, Y., &Nakakoji, K. (2005). Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 63, 513–535. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.023
Zangeneh, M., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). A comparative study between parametric and artificial neural networks approaches for economical assessment of potato production in Iran. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(3), 661-671. doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110903-371-10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.36.14110
![50 Juegos Para El Pensamiento Lateral Pdf 50 Juegos Para El Pensamiento Lateral Pdf](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cAJVOgwoW4U/UY_q_xsBjNI/AAAAAAAAAqo/bwk4HrsBPw4/s1600/PensamientoCriticoEspindolaC.jpg)
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
La revista se publica bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 4.0
![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125842697/990563393.png)